Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2015 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (9) TMI 817 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of imported crude palm oil.
2. Determination of the quantity of crude palm oil for duty assessment.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of Imported Crude Palm Oil

The central issue was whether the imported crude palm oil should be classified under Chapter Heading 15111000 as claimed by the assessee or under Chapter Heading 15119090 as per the Revenue's contention. The assessee argued that the goods should fall under entry No. 29 classifiable under 15111000, relying on the test report of the Chemical Examiner and the Certificate of Analysis issued by the Port Health Officer, both confirming that the imported goods were crude palm oil of edible grade. The assessee also referred to the HSN Explanatory Notes, which support the classification under 15111000, and argued that the department wrongly classified the goods based on the description given in entry 34 of the exemption notification 21/02, which specifies various acid values and carotenoid content for exemption purposes.

The Revenue, on the other hand, argued that the classification should be as per the CODEX Standard for vegetable oil and the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, which specify standards for edible palm oil. They contended that the description in the notification read with the Board's circular should be applicable for classification.

The Tribunal held that for classification of imported goods, the General Interpretative Rules for classification should be followed, and the description in the chapter subheading, chapter notes, and section notes should be the criteria. The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in Gujarat Ambuja Exports Vs CC Kandla, which dealt with a similar issue and held that the imported goods should be classified under CTH 15111000 and not under CTH 15119090. The Tribunal concluded that the imported crude palm oil should be classified under Chapter Heading 15111000 and eligible for exemption under Sl.No.29 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus.

Issue 2: Determination of Quantity for Duty Assessment

The second issue was whether the quantity of crude palm oil should be determined based on the ship's ullage report or the physical weighment done at the time of discharge at the port. The assessee argued that the actual quantity loaded in the tankers, which was weighed at the port in the presence of customs officers, should be considered. They contended that the Board's circular No.96/2002-Cus., which specifies that the ullage report should be taken for quantity determination, is not applicable in their case as the goods were not discharged directly to shore tanks.

The Revenue argued that the quantity declared in the Bill of Lading or the ullage quantity as per the master of the vessel should be considered. They relied on the Board's circular and the Tribunal's decisions in Mangalore Refinery & Petrochem Ltd. Vs CC Mangalore and CCE Vs Nikhil Refineries Ltd., which supported their contention.

The Tribunal found that the Board's circular pertains to cases where the liquid cargo is discharged directly to shore tanks, which was not the case here. The imported crude palm oil was transferred to barges and then loaded into tankers, which were weighed at the port. The Tribunal concluded that the actual quantity loaded on the tankers at the port should be taken for assessment for payment of customs duty.

Conclusion:

1. The imported crude palm oil is rightly classifiable under Chapter Heading 15111000 and is eligible for exemption under Sl.No.29 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus.
2. The actual quantity loaded on the tankers at the port should be taken for assessment for payment of customs duty.

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and rejected the Revenue's appeal. The cross-objections filed by the Revenue were disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates