Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2016 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (2) TMI 246 - HC - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the order passed by the Customs Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) dismissing the Petitioner's appeal.
2. Interpretation of export obligations under the Import Export Pass Book Scheme.
3. Applicability of Notification No. 117/88-Cus dated 29th March, 1988.
4. Limitation period for issuing show cause notice under Section 28 of the Customs Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the CEGAT Order:
The Petitioner, sole proprietor of M/s Aval International, sought the quashing of the CEGAT's order dated 19th May 1998, which upheld the Additional Collector of Customs' order dated 24th January 1992. The CEGAT had dismissed the Petitioner's Appeal No. C/446/92-B2, holding that the Petitioner had not fulfilled the norms under Notification No. 117/88-Customs dated 29th March 1988 regarding export obligations under the Import Export Pass Book Scheme.

2. Interpretation of Export Obligations:
The Import Export Pass Book Scheme, introduced under Chapter XX of the Import and Export Policy (1988-1991), aimed to provide duty-free inputs to manufacturer-exporters. The Petitioner argued that the only obligation was to export natural silk garments worth Rs. 20 lakhs, which was fulfilled even before the import. However, the Respondents contended that the Petitioner failed to meet the export obligation as the weight of the exported consignment was only 557.147 kgs, thus not utilizing the entire imported raw silk quantity (1424.82 kgs).

3. Applicability of Notification No. 117/88-Cus:
The Central Government's Notification No. 117/88-Cus under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act exempted goods imported for manufacturing resultant products for export. The notification did not specify the consequences of not exporting the resultant goods in terms of both value and quantity. The Petitioner's licence only specified the export obligation in terms of value, not quantity. The Court noted that the policy (Para 271 (2)) clearly stated that for pass books issued as per Appendix 14-A, the export obligation was to be fulfilled in terms of value only.

4. Limitation Period for Issuing Show Cause Notice:
The Petitioner argued that the show cause notice dated 24th August 1991 was barred by limitation as it was issued more than six months after the goods' clearance. The Court agreed, noting that neither the original order nor the CEGAT order addressed this specific ground raised by the Petitioner.

Conclusion:
The Court found that the Petitioner had no obligation to comply with any 'quantity' norms for export under Notification No. 117/88-Cus and had fulfilled the requirement in terms of value. Consequently, the Court set aside the order in original dated 24th January 1992 by the Assistant Collector of Customs and the CEGAT's order dated 19th May 1998. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates