Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2016 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (6) TMI 133 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 11 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding set off of deficit from the previous financial year against surplus of the current financial year for charitable trusts.

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against an order by the ITAT, Hyderabad for the assessment year 2005-06. The respondent, engaged in Scientific Research in Biomedical Science, declared 'NIL' income after claiming exemption under Section 10 (21) of the Act. However, the assessing officer brought the surplus amount to tax after observing that the assessee had not filed Form-10 and had transferred an amount exceeding 15% of gross receipts to the capital fund.

The Commissioner, on appeal, considered the deficit from the previous financial year and directed the assessing officer to verify the claim. The Tribunal, relying on judgments from the Madras and Gujarat High Courts, upheld the Commissioner's order, allowing the set off of deficit against the surplus for the current year for charitable trusts.

In the final analysis, the High Court held that Section 11 (1) (a) of the Act does not prohibit the set off of deficit from the previous financial year against the surplus of the current financial year for charitable trusts. The CBDT circular dated 24.01.1973 allows trusts to repay loans taken for charitable purposes from subsequent year's income, which qualifies as application of income for charitable purposes. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's order, dismissing the appeal and upholding the set off of deficit against surplus for charitable trusts.

Therefore, the High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that there was no substantial question of law necessitating interference. Miscellaneous petitions pending were also dismissed, and no order as to costs was issued.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates