9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (12) TMI 255 - HC - Income TaxTPA - comparable selection criteria - Held that - Assessee provides IT abled services in infrastructure development and testing, system and performance operations management and support etc. ,thus companies functionally dissimilar with that of assessee need to be deselected from final list of comparable.
Issues:
1. Exclusion of four comparables in Transfer Pricing Report 2. Treatment of foreign exchange gain in ALP determination 3. Justification of exclusion of Transfer Pricing adjustment by TPO Issue 1: Exclusion of Four Comparables The High Court analyzed the exclusion of four comparables in the Transfer Pricing Report. E-clerx was excluded due to functional dissimilarities and unavailability of segmental data, providing high-end/BPO services different from the Assessee's IT services. ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd. and TCS E-serve were also excluded based on functional dissimilarities and lack of segmental data, with TCS E-serve's close connection to TATA Consultancy Service Ltd. impacting its profitability positively. The exclusion of Accentia, a Software Development Company, was upheld due to functional and segmental data unavailability, engaging in KPO services in the healthcare sector. The Court found the exclusions reasonable based on factual findings, dismissing the appeals. Issue 2: Treatment of Foreign Exchange Gain The Court referred to previous judgments to support its decision on foreign exchange gain treatment. It cited a case where foreign exchange gains related to trading items and international transactions cannot be treated as Non-Operating losses and gains. The Court noted the Revenue's reliance on Safe Harbour Rules, but as the assessment period was before the rules' enforcement, the treatment was not applicable. Consequently, no question of law arose regarding foreign exchange gain treatment. Issue 3: Justification of Transfer Pricing Adjustment Exclusion Regarding the exclusion of Transfer Pricing adjustment by the TPO, the Court referenced a previous case where notional income on delayed payment could not be part of income adjustments. The Court found no question of law arising from the TPO's treatment of notional interest, citing a similar case where such adjustments were not considered as part of income. Therefore, the Court concluded that the exclusion of Transfer Pricing adjustments and notional interest did not warrant legal consideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.
|
