9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 147 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance of interest being a notional interest on the interest free advance - Held that - The assessee has stated that it was having sufficient amount to give advance free loans to Mrs. Preeti Sharma and Mr. Rijwan Khan. In support of this, the assessee has drawn our attention to the paper book page no.11, where the balance sheet as on 31.3.2009 is enclosed. On the said balance sheet, it is evident that the assessee was having sufficient balances to make such advances. Therefore, we direct the AO to delete these disallowances.- Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
1. Addition of ?6,39,274 to the total income of the appellant. 2. Lack of correlation between interest-free advances and borrowed funds. 3. Addition on account of notional interest ignoring sufficient surplus in Capital Account. 4. Failure to follow the ratio of a specific judgment by the High Court. Analysis: Issue 1: Addition of ?6,39,274 to the total income The appellant challenged the addition made by the AO on account of disallowance of interest expenses. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition, stating that the appellant failed to establish a direct nexus between interest-free funds and non-interest bearing loans. The appellant argued that the capital available was higher than the interest-free advance and cited judgments to support the claim. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had sufficient funds to provide interest-free loans, directing the AO to delete the disallowance. Issue 2: Lack of correlation between interest-free advances and borrowed funds The appellant contended that the AO and CIT(A) did not prove a nexus between borrowing and interest-free advances. Citing relevant judgments, the appellant argued that disallowances were unsustainable. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, emphasizing the need for a direct link between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, and directed the deletion of the disallowance. Issue 3: Addition on account of notional interest ignoring surplus in Capital Account The appellant highlighted that the AO and CIT(A) did not consider the surplus in the Capital Account while confirming the addition on account of notional interest. The appellant referred to judgments supporting the utilization of surplus funds for interest-free loans. The Tribunal, after reviewing the balance sheet and sufficient balances available, directed the AO to delete the disallowances. Issue 4: Failure to follow the ratio of a specific judgment by the High Court The appellant argued that the CIT(A) did not follow the ratio of a judgment by the High Court, leading to an erroneous confirmation of the addition. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and material on record, found in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and directing the deletion of the disallowances. In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the additions made by the AO regarding interest expenses, emphasizing the importance of establishing a direct nexus between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, and considering the surplus in the Capital Account while assessing notional interest. The Tribunal's decision was based on the appellant's ability to demonstrate sufficient funds for interest-free loans and the failure of the lower authorities to establish a clear link between borrowed funds and advances.
|
