Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2018 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (3) TMI 1482 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Appeal against setting aside of penalties imposed for availing Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes.
- Interpretation of admissibility of Cenvat Credit on capital goods.
- Application of the doctrine of merger in the context of judicial decisions.

Analysis:
1. Penalties Imposed for Availing Cenvat Credit on Welding Electrodes:
The appeals were taken together as they arose from a common impugned order where penalties imposed on the respondents for availing Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes were set aside by the learned Commissioner (Appeals). The Revenue contended that the penalties should not have been waived as the respondents wrongly availed the credit even after a final order by the Tribunal in their own case. The Tribunal considered the arguments and referred to a ruling of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which held that Modvat Credit on welding electrodes was admissible based on a previous decision of the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the doctrine of merger applied, and since the Supreme Court had dismissed the Civil Appeal against the Tribunal's decision, the finding that Cenvat Credit was admissible on electrodes had reached finality. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the respondents were entitled to consequential relief as per law.

2. Interpretation of Admissibility of Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods:
The Revenue argued that different decisions and judgments existed for the interpretation of the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on duty paid on capital goods. They contended that the respondents availed Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes wrongly even after the Tribunal's final order in their case. However, the Tribunal, after considering the contentions and perusing the records, found that the penalties imposed on the respondents for availing Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes were rightly dismissed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal referred to the doctrine of merger and the previous rulings to support its decision that the Cenvat Credit on electrodes was admissible, thus upholding the Commissioner's decision to set aside the penalties.

3. Application of the Doctrine of Merger in Judicial Decisions:
The Tribunal extensively discussed the doctrine of merger in the context of judicial decisions. It highlighted that after the Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeal against the Tribunal's decision regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on electrodes, the Tribunal's finding had attained finality. The Tribunal emphasized that as per the doctrine of merger, the decision of the higher court confirmed the observations of the Tribunal, leading to the conclusion that there was no merit in the Revenue's appeal. Consequently, both appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the respondents were granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates