Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2018 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (11) TMI 537 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Exemption application.
3. Question of jurisdiction remanded by Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) pending Supreme Court appeal.
4. Applicability of previous court order in similar circumstances.

Condonation of Delay:
The High Court condoned a delay of 173 days in filing the appeal based on the reasons mentioned in the application. The delay was deemed justified, and the application was disposed of accordingly.

Exemption Application:
An exemption application was allowed subject to all just exceptions, as per the court's decision.

Question of Jurisdiction Remanded by CESTAT:
The appellant raised a question regarding the justification of CESTAT's decision to remand the matter for adjudication to determine jurisdiction pending a Supreme Court appeal. The Court issued a notice on the matter, and the respondent accepted the notice. Referring to a previous decision, the Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to CESTAT. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal on its merits, including the jurisdiction issue, without being influenced by the previous decision of the High Court. The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits or procedures to be followed by the Tribunal.

Applicability of Previous Court Order:
The Court's decision in a previous case involving similar circumstances was cited, where the impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal was directed to decide the appeals on their merits without being influenced by the previous decision. Following this precedent, the current appeal was partly allowed in similar terms, with no opinion expressed on the merits or procedures to be adopted by the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates