9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (11) TMI 1509 - AT - Central ExciseMonetary limit of amount involved in the appeal - M/s Navbharat Industries was issued with five show-cause notices for recovery of ₹ 14,50,429/-, of ₹ 10,42,240/-, of ₹ 9,63,266/-, of ₹ 18,09,053/- and of ₹ 16,34,829/-. Likewise, M/s Shree New India Processors were issued with a single show-cause notice for recovery of ₹ 4,70,460/- and of ₹ 3,94,164/- - Held that - The litigation policy of Government of India notified in F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17th December 2015 of Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi, and enhanced by amendment dated 11th July 2018 are taken to that the monetary limits for pursuing of appeals before the Tribunal has not been crossed in each of these disputes - appeals of Revenue against M/s Shree New India Processors and M/s Navbharat Industries dismissed.
Issues:
Appeals by Revenue against order-in-appeal regarding duty liability on cotton fabrics processed out of exempted grey fabrics, liability discharge by debit in CENVAT credit account, recovery of collected duty, show-cause notices issued to M/s Shree New India Processors and M/s Navbharat Industries, confirmation of duty liability, separate disposal of appeals for amounts below ?20 lakhs, litigation policy of Government of India, dismissal of Revenue's appeals. Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai involved four appeals by Revenue against the order-in-appeal related to duty liability on cotton fabrics processed from exempted grey fabrics. The duty liability of 4% and 8% was discharged by debit in CENVAT credit account under notification no.29/2004-CE. The issue was whether the duty collected by the appellants but discharged by debit in the CENVAT credit account was recoverable, considering notification no.30/2004-CE permitted clearance without duty payment. The appeals were against the order-in-appeal favoring M/s Shree New India Processors and M/s Navbharat Industries. Upon reviewing the records, it was found that M/s Navbharat Industries faced five show-cause notices for varying amounts, while M/s Shree New India Processors had a single show-cause notice for recovery. The duty liability for M/s Shree New India Processors was confirmed by the original authority but set aside by the first appellate authority, leading to Revenue's appeal. Similarly, various demands against M/s Navbharat Industries were less than ?20,00,000. The judgment highlighted that each confirmed demand from the show-cause notices was below ?20 lakhs. Although separate orders-in-original should have been issued for each show-cause notice, the original authority combined them. However, the first appellate authority assigned separate numbers for each order-in-appeal corresponding to the show-cause notices. The Tribunal emphasized that despite the convention allowing a common appeal by Revenue, each appeal must be dealt with separately. The judgment referred to the litigation policy of the Government of India to ensure the monetary limits for appeals were not exceeded in each dispute. Consequently, the appeals by Revenue against M/s Shree New India Processors and M/s Navbharat Industries were dismissed in line with the mentioned policy.
|
