Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (3) TMI 270 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition of ?3,44,26,263 on account of unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961.
2. Deletion of addition of ?4,18,46,093 on account of cash credit under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961.
3. Deletion of disallowance of ?4,84,53,923 on account of sundry creditors under Section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition of ?3,44,26,263 on Account of Unexplained Cash Credit:
The Assessing Officer (AO) added ?3,44,26,263 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, observing that the credit balance with Opera Global P. Ltd. did not appear as a corresponding debit in the latter's balance sheet. The assessee explained that Opera Global P. Ltd. made payments on its behalf to SBI and SIDBI, which increased the credit balance. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, confirming the genuineness of the transactions with supporting documents, including bank statements and balance sheets. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO ignored the assessee's detailed submissions and supporting evidence. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

2. Deletion of Addition of ?4,18,46,093 on Account of Cash Credit:
The AO added ?4,18,46,093, treating the opening balance with Opera Global P. Ltd. as unexplained under Section 68. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, reasoning that Section 68 applies only to credits during the year, not to opening balances. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the balance matched between the assessee and Opera Global P. Ltd. and that the addition was not tenable under Section 68 as it pertained to an earlier year. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

3. Deletion of Disallowance of ?4,84,53,923 on Account of Sundry Creditors:
The AO added ?4,84,53,923, considering long-standing sundry creditors as income under Section 41(1), arguing that the liabilities had ceased. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that the liabilities were still acknowledged in the books and not written off, thus not constituting remission or cessation of liability. The Tribunal upheld this view, emphasizing that the assessee's application under the Sick Industrial Companies Act and the continued acknowledgment of debt justified the delay in payment. The Tribunal also rejected the applicability of Section 28(iv), as the assessee did not receive any benefit or perquisite. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground, referencing the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd., which supported the assessee's position.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s deletion of all three additions. The decision was based on the genuineness of transactions, proper application of legal provisions, and supporting evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's grounds for appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s order in its entirety.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates