Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (3) TMI 1286 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Liquidation Orders
2. Role and Responsibilities of the Liquidator
3. Application of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013
4. Judicial Precedents and Legal Provisions
5. Directions to the Liquidator

Detailed Analysis:

1. Liquidation Orders:
The appeals were filed by the management of two corporate debtors against the orders dated 25th June 2018, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, which ordered the liquidation of both companies under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code). The appellate tribunal noted that there were no resolution plans submitted for the revival of the companies, and thus, it was not inclined to interfere with the liquidation orders.

2. Role and Responsibilities of the Liquidator:
The management's counsel argued that the Liquidator should keep the companies as 'going concerns' during liquidation and could take steps under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, in consultation with the members or creditors. The Liquidator's counsel assured that the Liquidator would ensure the companies remain going concerns and take appropriate steps as required by law, subject to the Adjudicating Authority's approval.

3. Application of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013:
Section 230 allows for a compromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors or members, even if the company is being wound up. The tribunal directed the Liquidator to proceed under Section 230 before selling the assets of the corporate debtors. The Liquidator was instructed to verify claims, take custody of assets, and carry on the business for beneficial liquidation, as per Section 35 of the I&B Code. The process under Section 230 should be completed within 90 days.

4. Judicial Precedents and Legal Provisions:
The tribunal referenced several Supreme Court judgments, including 'Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.' and 'Meghal Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors.', which emphasized the revival and continuation of the corporate debtor as the primary focus of the legislation. The tribunal highlighted that liquidation should be a last resort and that the Liquidator could sell the business as a going concern.

5. Directions to the Liquidator:
The Liquidator was directed to verify claims, take control of assets, and carry on the business for beneficial liquidation. The tribunal emphasized that the Liquidator should take steps under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, before proceeding with the sale of assets. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to pass appropriate orders if required. The tribunal also excluded the period of pendency of the appeals from the liquidation timeline.

In conclusion, the tribunal upheld the liquidation orders but provided detailed directions to the Liquidator to ensure the companies remain going concerns and to explore revival options under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, before proceeding with the sale of assets. The appeals were disposed of with these observations and directions, with no costs imposed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates