9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (3) TMI 1288 - HC - CustomsNote for Speaking to the Minutes - Rectification in order of High Court - Held that - It appears that the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner is correct. Accordingly, in paragraph 50 of the judgment and order dated 04.02.2019 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.14558 of 2018 and allied matters, the words inserted vide preceding the words clause (xii) shall stand deleted, and the word inserted shall be inserted after the words Notification No.18/2015-Cus and a comma shall be added after the date 13.10.2017 at the end of the fourth line thereof - The Note stands disposed of accordingly.
Issues: Correction of errors in a judgment
The judgment delivered by the Gujarat High Court involved correcting errors in a previous judgment dated 04.02.2019. The petitioner's advocate pointed out mistakes in paragraph 50 of the judgment, specifically regarding the wording related to Notification No.18/2015-Cus. The court acknowledged the errors and made the necessary corrections as requested by the advocate. The corrected version of paragraph 50 was provided in the judgment, which essentially struck down certain conditions as ultra vires and allowed the petitions, ruling in favor of the petitioners. The court made the corrections as per the submission by the advocate, ensuring the accuracy of the judgment. The main issue in this judgment was the correction of errors identified in a previous judgment passed by the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner's advocate highlighted the inaccuracies in paragraph 50 of the judgment, specifically related to the wording concerning Notification No.18/2015-Cus. The court, after perusing the submission, agreed with the advocate's assessment of the errors. Consequently, the court proceeded to rectify the mistakes by deleting certain words, inserting the correct term, and adding a missing comma in paragraph 50. The corrected version of paragraph 50 was provided in the judgment, which ultimately led to the striking down of certain conditions and the allowance of the petitions in favor of the petitioners. The court's decision to correct the errors as pointed out by the advocate ensured the accuracy and validity of the judgment.
|
