Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (11) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (11) TMI 283 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Whether the execution of the civil works of Pazhassi Sagar Small Hydro Electric Project falls under Sl.No.3 (iii) (b) or 3(vi) of Notification No.11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 12%?
2. Whether Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd qualifies as a Government Entity or Governmental Authority for GST purposes?

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The applicant sought clarification on the GST rate applicable to the civil works of the hydroelectric project. The work order involved various construction activities, and the applicant inquired if it would attract 12% GST under specific provisions of Notification No. 11/2017. The ruling authority examined the nature of the supply, considering the definitions of works contract and the entities involved. It was determined that the conditions for availing the 12% GST rate were met, leading to the conclusion that the works contract with Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd fell under the specified category for concessional tax treatment.

Issue 2:
The analysis delved into whether Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd could be classified as a Government Entity or Governmental Authority based on the definitions provided in the relevant notifications. The Board's establishment, functions, and ownership structure were scrutinized to ascertain its categorization. It was established that while the Board did not fit the definition of Governmental Authority, it unequivocally fell under the definition of a Government Entity. This distinction was crucial in determining the applicability of the concessional GST rate. The ruling clarified that the Board's commercial nature in electricity generation, transmission, and distribution precluded it from qualifying for the lower GST rate intended for non-commercial projects.

Conclusion:
The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised by the applicant regarding the GST treatment of the civil works contract for the hydroelectric project with Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. By dissecting the legal provisions, definitions, and the nature of the project, the ruling authority arrived at a comprehensive decision, outlining the inapplicability of the concessional GST rates under the specified entries. The judgment's thorough examination of the facts and legal framework ensured a clear and reasoned outcome for the parties involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates