Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (11) TMI 636 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of the Assessee Co-operative Society for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Denial of deduction under Section 80P by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).
3. Classification of the Assessee as a Co-operative Bank.
4. Investment of surplus funds in Co-operative Banks and its impact on eligibility for deduction under Section 80P.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility of the Assessee Co-operative Society for Deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The Assessee, a registered cooperative society under the Maharashtra Co-operative Society Act, 1960, claimed a deduction of ?16,66,531/- under Section 80P of the Act for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The primary business of the Assessee was providing credit facilities to its members. The Tribunal referred to the case of Sai Prerana Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Pat Sanshta Maryadit, where a similar issue was adjudicated in favor of the assessee, confirming that the Assessee Co-operative Society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P.

2. Denial of Deduction under Section 80P by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A):
The Assessing Officer denied the deduction under Section 80P, stating that the Assessee was acting like a regular bank by accepting deposits from non-members and nominal members, thus violating the bye-laws of the society. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, relying on the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment in Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. vs. ACIT, which recognized two kinds of members and held that the Assessee did not qualify as a cooperative bank and invoked the provisions of Section 80P(4).

3. Classification of the Assessee as a Co-operative Bank:
The Tribunal examined whether the Assessee could be classified as a Co-operative Bank. The Assessing Officer argued that the Assessee acted like a Co-operative Bank by accepting deposits and providing loans to non-members and nominal members. However, the Tribunal referred to the decision in Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanshta Ltd., which clarified that a Co-operative Credit Society is distinct from a Co-operative Bank and thus eligible for deduction under Section 80P. The Tribunal also noted that the Assessee did not have a license from the RBI to operate as a bank, thus Section 80P(4) was not applicable.

4. Investment of Surplus Funds in Co-operative Banks and its Impact on Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P:
The Assessing Officer contended that the Assessee was not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) because it invested surplus funds in Co-operative Banks instead of Co-operative Societies. The Tribunal, however, referred to the decision in Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanshta Ltd., which allowed such deductions. The Tribunal also considered the Hon'ble Bombay High Court’s judgment in Jalgaon District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., which held that the definition of 'member' includes nominal, associate, and sympathizer members, thus supporting the Assessee's eligibility for deduction.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee Co-operative Society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. It held that the Assessee is not a Co-operative Bank and thus not subject to the restrictions of Section 80P(4). The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, granting the deduction of ?16,66,531/- under Section 80P.

Order:
The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the grounds raised by the Assessee were upheld. The Tribunal pronounced the order on the 23rd day of September, 2019.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates