Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2020 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 647 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Import of vehicles without paying Entry Tax
2. Proposal to levy penalty under Entry Tax Act, 1990
3. Bona fide belief of importer regarding Entry Tax exemption
4. Legal precedent on penalty imposition for failure to pay statutory obligations

Analysis:

Issue 1: Import of vehicles without paying Entry Tax
The petitioner, a company engaged in road laying and construction, imported three heavy road laying vehicles without paying the Entry Tax initially due to the prevailing law exempting them from such payment. However, following a verification by the Enforcement Wing, the petitioner admitted the omission and paid the Entry Tax amount of ?22,59,619 on the same day.

Issue 2: Proposal to levy penalty under Entry Tax Act, 1990
The impugned notice proposed to levy a penalty at twice the amount of tax under Section 15(1) of the Entry Tax Act, 1990, on the grounds of non-payment of Entry Tax initially. The Additional Government Pleader argued in favor of upholding the penalty citing a Division Bench decision requiring payment of Entry Tax on imported vehicles in Tamil Nadu.

Issue 3: Bona fide belief of importer regarding Entry Tax exemption
The petitioner contended that they believed in good faith that they were exempt from paying Entry Tax at the time of import due to the prevailing laws. They argued that the penalty proposal should be waived considering their immediate payment of Entry Tax upon being informed of the omission. Legal counsel cited relevant judgments by the Hon'ble Apex Court supporting the waiver of penalties in cases of bona fide belief.

Issue 4: Legal precedent on penalty imposition for failure to pay statutory obligations
The Court reviewed past judgments, including E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd. and Hindustan Steel Ltd., emphasizing that penalties for failure to fulfill statutory obligations should be imposed only in cases of deliberate defiance of the law or contumacious conduct. The Court found that the petitioner acted in good faith, and the proposed penalty was unjustifiable based on the established legal principles.

In conclusion, the Court set aside the impugned notice proposing the penalty, ruling in favor of the petitioner based on the bona fide belief in the exemption from Entry Tax at the time of import and the immediate payment upon realization of the omission. The judgment aligned with the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court regarding penalty imposition for statutory non-compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates