Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2020 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 676 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2005-2006.

Analysis:
The High Court of Madras dealt with the issue of the Assessee's entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2005-2006. The Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, questioning whether the Assessee was rightly granted the deduction. The Tribunal's findings highlighted the dispute regarding the inclusion of car parking areas in the built-up area for the purpose of verifying the permissible limit of 1500 sq.ft as prescribed in the section. The Tribunal concluded that the car parking area should be excluded from the calculation of built-up residential units based on the Tamil Nadu Apartments Ownership Act and agreements with buyers. This decision was in line with a previous judgment of the court in a similar case for the preceding Assessment Year 2004-2005.

The court referred to a co-ordinate Bench judgment in CIT v. Subba Reddy (HUF) where it was emphasized that the definition of "built-up area" excludes common areas shared with other residential units. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 80IB(10) and Section 80IB(14)(a) of the Income Tax Act to determine the computation of the built-up area for claiming deductions. It was concluded that there was no justification for including the car park in the definition of the built-up area of the residential unit. The court upheld the reasoning of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, based on the Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, in excluding the car parking area from the built-up area calculation.

Given that the issue was already settled by a previous decision of the co-ordinate Bench of the court, the present Appeal was disposed of accordingly. The court held that the Assessee was entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 80IB of the Act. Consequently, the Appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the question of law was answered in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates