Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2020 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (11) TMI 109 - HC - GST


Issues:
Challenging jurisdiction of the court in granting anticipatory bail, absence of notice to the petitioner/department, extension of anticipatory bail without notice, withdrawal of petition seeking notice to department.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a challenge against a bail order granted by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) of Rohini District Court. The petitioner contested that the ASJ of Rohini lacked jurisdiction to pass the bail order, asserting that the jurisdiction lies with the ACMM and/or ASJ of Patiala House Court. Moreover, it was argued that no notice was served to the petitioner/department during the issuance of the bail orders, even though the benefit granted had expired on a specific date. The anticipatory bail, originally granted to the respondents, was extended until a later date without any notice to the department. Consequently, the petitioner expressed the intention to withdraw the petition as the extended bail was nearing expiration, but sought a directive for the trial court to issue notice to the department upon the filing of a fresh application. The respondents' counsels objected to this request. The petitioner's counsel assured that an application would be filed before the Additional Sessions Court to clarify jurisdiction and ensure notice to the petitioner/department. Subsequently, the petition was disposed of based on the aforementioned submissions and actions proposed by the petitioner's counsel.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates