Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (6) TMI 480 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Admissibility of the application under Section 97/98 of the CGST Act.
2. Determination of the rate of tax for HSN entries: DRY COCONUT (EDIBLE) HSN 08011920 and COPRA (Dry Coconut for Milling) HSN 1203.

Issue 1: Admissibility of the application under Section 97/98 of the CGST Act:
The Authority analyzed the application's admissibility under Section 97/98 of the CGST Act. The applicant had previously sought Provisional Assessment under Section 60 of the CGST Act, and the classification and applicable rate under GST were already decided in those proceedings. The Jurisdictional Authority had clarified the classification of the products, stating that Edible Dry Coconut falls under HSN Code 08011920 with NIL GST, while Dry Coconut for Milling falls under HSN 1203 with 5% GST. Consequently, the Authority found that the present application seeking a ruling on the applicable rate for the same products was inadmissible under the first Proviso to Section 98(2) of the Act.

Issue 2: Determination of the rate of tax for HSN entries: DRY COCONUT (EDIBLE) HSN 08011920 and COPRA (Dry Coconut for Milling) HSN 1203:
The applicant, engaged in dry coconut processing and trading, sought a ruling on the tax rate for the mentioned HSN entries. The applicant's products were classified as Edible Dry Coconut and Dry Coconut for Milling. The Customs Tariff Act, 1975, clarified that Edible Dry Coconut attracts NIL GST under HSN Code 08011920, while Dry Coconut for Milling falls under HSN 1203 with a 5% GST rate. Samples were tested, confirming the product as Edible Dry Coconut. The State jurisdictional authority did not report any pending proceedings on the applicant's case regarding the raised issues. The Authority thoroughly examined the facts, documents, and submissions before ruling that the application was inadmissible due to the prior decision on classification and applicable rates under GST.

In conclusion, the Advance Ruling Authority ruled that the application was not admissible under the first Proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act as the classification and applicable rates for the products in question had already been decided in prior proceedings under Section 60 of the Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates