Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (6) TMI 667 - AT - Income Tax


Issues: Delay in filing appeal, Treatment of donations as anonymous, Compliance with section 115BBC of the Act

Delay in filing appeal:
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay of 135 days. The Tribunal condoned the delay based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, excluding the period of limitation for filing appeals between specific dates. The Tribunal proceeded to adjudicate the case on its merits despite the delay.

Treatment of donations as anonymous:
The case involved an assessee, a Trust running educational institutions, which received a corpus donation but failed to file confirmation letters for a significant portion of the amount. The Ld. AO treated a substantial sum as anonymous donation under section 115BBC of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal after the assessee submitted confirmation letters from donors, numbering 2300, and provided evidence of filing these letters on the electronic portal of the department.

Compliance with section 115BBC of the Act:
The Revenue raised various grounds challenging the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), including issues related to the timing of submission of confirmation letters, lack of verification by the AO, and acceptance of the assessee's contentions. The Tribunal heard arguments from both sides and analyzed the provisions of section 115BBC, which require maintaining records of the identity of donors. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had provided details of donors, including names and addresses, to the Revenue Authorities, and the absence of PAN in confirmation letters did not render the donations anonymous. The Tribunal held that the donations were not anonymous as the identity of donors was established, and thus, the provisions of section 115BBC did not apply. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment covers the issues of delay in filing the appeal, treatment of donations as anonymous, and compliance with section 115BBC of the Act, providing a detailed overview of the legal proceedings and the Tribunal's decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates