Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 735 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Reduction of profit of the eligible unit by Rs. 39,30,800/- on account of Bagasse Purchase under section 80-IA(8) read with section 80-IA(10).
2. Reduction of profit of the eligible unit by Rs. 1,76,320/- on account of interest allocation under section 80-IA(10).

Summary:

Issue 1: Reduction of profit on account of Bagasse Purchase:

The Assessee filed a return of income for A.Y. 2013-14, declaring total income at Rs. 98,86,924/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the Assessee claimed a deduction under section 80IA amounting to Rs. 97,39,747/-. The Assessee's manufacturing unit sold "bagasse" to its power unit at Rs. 1600/- per metric ton. The AO compared this rate with the rate provided by Kadwa Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., which was Rs. 2874/- per metric ton, and other suppliers, concluding that the market rate was Rs. 2000/- per metric ton. Consequently, the AO recalculated the profit and made an addition of Rs. 39,30,800/-.

On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. However, the Assessee argued before the Tribunal that it sold "bagasse" to third parties at Rs. 1400/- per metric ton and to its power unit at Rs. 1600/- per metric ton, indicating no intent to reduce the profit of the manufacturing unit. The Tribunal noted that the internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) should be used rather than external CUP. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee sold "bagasse" at market rate to its eligible unit and directed the AO to delete the addition made on account of the difference in the rate of "bagasse". Therefore, Ground No. 1, 1.1, and 1.2 of the Assessee were allowed.

Issue 2: Reduction of profit on account of interest allocation:

At the outset, the Assessee's representative submitted that Ground No. 2 was not pressed. Consequently, Ground No. 2 was dismissed as not pressed.

General Ground:

Ground No. 3, being general in nature, required no adjudication and was dismissed.

Conclusion:

The appeal of the Assessee was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the deletion of the addition made on account of the difference in the rate of "bagasse". The order was pronounced in the open Court on 25th April, 2023.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates