Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (2) TMI 372 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to interest on the amount sanctioned as a refund.
2. Rate of interest and the period for which it should be calculated.

Summary:

Issue 1: Entitlement to Interest on Refund

The appellants, engaged in managing malls, contested the denial of interest on a refunded amount of Rs.7,15,09,643/-, which was initially deposited during an investigation. The refund was sanctioned without interest, leading to the appeal. The Tribunal noted that the refund claim was filed within the permissible time limit and was not affected by the clause of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal referenced several decisions, including Parle Agro (P) Ltd vs. Commissioner CGST, Noida, and others, to establish that the issue of granting interest on refunded amounts is well-settled. The Tribunal concluded that the findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Mafatlal Industries case do not apply to this case.

Issue 2: Rate of Interest and Calculation Period

The Tribunal observed that the Adjudicating Authority had incorrectly invoked section 11B/11BB of the Central Excise Act, which pertains only to the refund of excise duty, not amounts collected without authority. The Tribunal relied on section 35FF of the Central Excise Act and the decision in Sandvik Asia Limited, which mandates interest on delayed refunds. The Tribunal also cited the case of Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd., which upheld a 12% interest rate on delayed refunds. Based on these precedents, the Tribunal held that the appellants are entitled to interest at 12% per annum, calculated from the date of deposit until the date of refund disbursement.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, directing the department to pay interest at 12% per annum on the refunded amount from the date of deposit until the date of disbursement.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates