9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (9) TMI 87 - AT - Income TaxRevision u/s 263 - Disallowance u/s 14A - HELD THAT - PCIT brought to the notice of the assessee, Explanation to section 14A of the Act through Finance Act, 2022 vide notice under section 263 and in response to the hearing notice, the assessee filed written submission dated 15.03.2024, which was reproduced in the impugned order at page 13 of the paper book, wherein, it was clearly contended that there was no dividend exempt income received in the year under consideration and the amendment made in section 14A by Finance Act, 2022 is prospective in nature. Therefore, we find that the AO examined the issue in detail during the course of original assessment proceedings and by applying the relevant statutory provision as it stood then, made no disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. Regarding the insertion of Explanation to section 14A of the Act by way of Finance Act, 2022, we find that while taking into consideration the said amendment, case of PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd 2022 (7) TMI 1093 - DELHI HIGH COURT held that it is settled law that the assessment has to be made with reference to the law, which is in existence at the relevant time. Thus we find the facts and circumstances before the Hon ble High Court are similar to the facts on hand, since the year under consideration before us is 2017-18 and has no applicability of Explanation inserted to section 14A of the Act. Therefore, we hold that exercise of jurisdiction by the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not justified and accordingly the revision order passed under section 263 of the Act is set aside. Thus, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) in directing the Assessing Officer to disallow under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Applicability of the amendment to section 14A of the Act by Finance Act, 2022. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Justification of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) in directing the Assessing Officer to disallow under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The appellant challenged the order dated 30.03.2024 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Madurai, under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18. The primary issue was whether the PCIT was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to work out disallowance under section 14A of the Act, contrary to the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd. [2022] 141 taxmann.com 289 (Delhi). The PCIT invoked jurisdiction under section 263, holding that the assessment order dated 24.01.2022 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. The PCIT directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment order after making necessary enquiries and verification as per law. The appellant's representative argued that the Assessing Officer had completed the original assessment in detail, issuing a notice under section 142(1) of the Act and requesting details of investments and exempt income. The appellant responded that no exempt income was earned during the year under consideration. The representative contended that the PCIT, without considering these submissions and the amendment to section 14A by Finance Act, 2022, erroneously held the assessment order as prejudicial to the Revenue. The respondent's representative argued that the Assessing Officer did not apply his mind while completing the original assessment, supporting the PCIT's decision. He argued that the amendment to section 14A by Finance Act, 2022, has retrospective effect, requiring disallowance even if no exempt income was earned. Upon hearing both parties, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had issued a notice under section 142(1) and received a response indicating no exempt income earned during the year. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer examined the issue in detail during the original assessment proceedings and made no disallowance under section 14A, as the relevant statutory provision did not require it at that time. 2. Applicability of the amendment to section 14A of the Act by Finance Act, 2022: The Tribunal considered the insertion of the Explanation to section 14A by Finance Act, 2022. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd. held that the amendment is applicable from assessment year 2022-23 onwards and not to previous years. The Tribunal reproduced relevant parts of the judgment, emphasizing that the law applicable is the one in existence at the relevant time. The Tribunal also referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in Sedco Forex International Drill. Inc. v. CIT, which held that a retrospective provision in a tax act cannot be presumed to be retrospective if it alters the law as it earlier stood. The Tribunal concluded that the amendment to section 14A by Finance Act, 2022, is prospective and does not apply to the assessment year 2017-18. Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the PCIT's exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 was not justified. The original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue, as the amendment to section 14A by Finance Act, 2022, is not applicable to the assessment year 2017-18. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revision order passed under section 263 was set aside. The order was pronounced on 14th August, 2024, at Chennai.
|
