Home Circulars 2007 Income Tax Income Tax - 2007 Order-Instruction - 2007 This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Convention (DTAC)- Suspension of Collection during Mutual Agreement Procedure - Section 90 of the Income Tax 1961 - Double Taxation Relief - Where agreement exist - Income Tax - INSTRUCTION NO. 10/2007Extract INSTRUCTION INCOME TAX ACT Sub: Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Convention (DTAC)- Suspension of Collection during Mutual Agreement Procedure - Section 90 of the Income Tax 1961 - Double Taxation Relief - Where agreement exist. INSTRUCTION NO. 10/2007 DATED 23-10-2007 . Article 27 of the Indo-USA DTAC provides for Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) for avoidance of double taxation. Paragraph 4 of Article 27 authorises the competent authorities to develop appropriate bilateral procedures, conditions, methods and techniques for implementation of MAP provided for in the Article. Accordingly, with a view to avoid the unintended hardship to the taxpayers, as well as for the efficient management of collection of revenue, the Competent Authorities of India and USA had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) regarding suspension of collection during the pendency of MAP. 2. This MoU was brought to the notice of field formation vide Instruction No. 2/2003 dated 28-4-2003 (F.No.500/56/99-FTD) wherein it was stated that the collection of outstanding taxes in the case of a taxpayer, who is a resident of USA and whose request under MAP is under consideration of the Competent Authorities, shall be kept in abeyance subject to furnishing of a bank guarantee of an amount equal to the amount of tax under dispute and interest accruing thereon as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act. 3. Now references have been received for extending the applicability of MoU to Indian resident entities in cases where Mutual Agreement Procedure has been invoked by the US resident. In order to avoid hardship to Indian resident taxpayers especially in cases involving transfer pricing, where the Indian resident entity is liable to pay taxes on such income which may have been charged to tax in the hands of the associated entity in USA, it has been decided to extend the applicability of the MoU to such Indian resident entities during the course of the pendency of the MAP invoked by a resident of USA. 4. On receipt of a formal request for suspension of collection of outstanding tax in terms of the MoU from a taxpayer being, a resident of USA or an Indian resident entity, in a case where MAP has been invoked through US Competent Authority and the same has been admitted by the Indian Competent Authority, the Assessing Officers are required to keep the enforcement of collection of outstanding taxes in abeyance in respect of such taxpayers - ( i ) after obtaining a confirmation regarding pendency of MAP from the Foreign Tax and Tax Research Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes and ( ii ) on receipt of a bank guarantee in the model draft format annexed to the MoU for an amount calculated in accordance with the manner indicated therein. 5. All the other conditions of MoU as enumerated in Instruction No. 2 of 2003 dated 28-4-2003 shall remain the same. 6. These instructions are issued under section 119 of the Income-tax Act and the same may be brought to the notice of all the officers in your charge.
|