Discussions Forum | ||||||||
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||
Cenvat credit of SAD - Reg, Central Excise |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Cenvat credit of SAD - Reg |
||||||||
We are purchasing imported Capital goods from various dealers. The Notification No. 102/2007 –Customs, dated 14.09.2007 has granted the exemption by way of refund of SAD to the dealers of imported goods. However, the dealers were passing the credit of SAD to the buyer instead of claiming refund with the Department. We have taken CENVAT credit of SAD on the strength of valid duty paying documents, which is now objected by the Excise Auditors. As per the Department, the dealer has to claim refund of SAD from the Department as per Notification No. 102/2007 –Customs, dated 14.09.2007. Kindly clarify whether the objection taken by the Excise Auditor is correct and we have to reverse the credit? Regards, VINAY
Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records Page: 1
As per my view, the objection raised by the audit is incorrect. In circular No. 06/2008-Customs, it has clearly provided that the importer declared that he has not passed the incidence of duty to his customer. It means importer has the option whether to pass or not. If importer passed the duty to his customer, benefit of cenvat will definitely allow.
What Mr. Pawan telling is correct. Whether SAD pass to customer or claim with department is depends on dealer's interest, but not mandatory to claim with department.
The objection of the Audit party is ridiculous, there is no such restriction in the Act or Rules. Whether to claim refund or to pass on SAD is entirely on the Dealer and the understanding and the objection is unsustainable.
Dear, Actually Excise Auditors do not hv proper knowledge and because of this, they take wrong points. My simple advise is to ask them to show the Rules & provisions.. R M Kandoi Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||