Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Twisting/supn of single yarn-Manufacture, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 109769
Dated: 21-1-2016
By:- Narendra Soni

Twisting/supn of single yarn-Manufacture


  • Contents

Dear Experts,

If a manufacturer imports polyester yarn and twist/spun/doubling the same, Is the "spun/twisted polyester yarn" product amount to manufacture.

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 5 of 5 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 21-1-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

Dear Mr. Soni,

Conversion of Single Yarn into Double or Multifold amounts to "Manufacture" reasons being cited below.

Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act defines Manufacture as any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of final product. Further note that both the products i.e. Single Yarn and Double Yarn are different in character and use also.

Even the Central Excise Tariff Headings are also different and the basic principle is that where the tariff headings changes, the process of manufacture results in and it has been followed in various cases and accepted by CBEC.

Refer to Clause 2 of Notes to Chapter 55 of Central Excise Act for Man-Made fibres, which is reproduced as below:

2. In relation to products falling under heading 5508 or 5509 or 5510, dyeing, printing, bleaching, mercerising, twisting, texturising, doubling, multiple-folding, cabling, air mingling, air texturing, any other process or any one or more of these processes, or the conversion of any form of the said products into another form of such product shall amount to 'manufacture

Hope the above addresses your query.

 

 

 


2 Dated: 21-1-2016
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir

Very apt clarification


3 Dated: 22-1-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

SH.CS SANJAY MALHOTRA Ji,

Interpretation is par excellence. No need to intervene and hence question of interference does not arise.


4 Dated: 22-1-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

Thanks to Seniors for validating the response.


5 Dated: 24-1-2016
By:- Mahir S

Yes, such activity do amount to manufacture , as nicely explained above.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates