section129(1)(b) of Rajasthan GST ACT, Goods and Services Tax - GST

[KANHAIYA AGRAWAL]

Please guide me regarding penalty deposited due to Goods Seized Under Section 129(1)(b) of the Rajasthan- RGST Act, 2017.

The seizure of our goods while in transit from Udaipur- Rajasthan, to Delhi. The goods were intercepted by Rajasthan RGST officers at Alwar- Rajasthan. The officers imposed a penalty under Section 129(1)(b) of the RGST Act, 2017 totalling ₹5,67,562/- (equal to 100% of the value of goods) for the release of the goods.

1. My Calculation:
   • Taxable Value of Goods: ₹5,67,562/- Tax (18%): ₹1,02,161/-
   • Penalty (50% of Value): ₹2,83,781/-
   • CGST: ₹1,41,891/- SGST: ₹1,41,891/-
2. Officers' Calculation:
   • Taxable Value of Goods: ₹5,67,562/- Tax (18%): ₹1,02,161/-
   • Penalty (100% of Value): ₹5,67,562/- (50% CGST + 50% SGST).
   • CGST: ₹2,83,781/-SGST: ₹2,83,781/-

The amount has been deposited under the head penalty CGST: ₹2,83,781/-SGST: ₹2,83,781/- to release the goods.

Please share correct calculation as per GST PROVISION?

Thanks in advance

Regards

Posts / Replies

[Amit Agrawal]

Dept's calculations for imposing penalty u/s 129(1)(b) is correct IMHO. "50% of value of goods" is the penalty u/s 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017 and "50% of value of goods" is the penalty u/s 129(1)(b) of the RGST Act, 2017 in given circumstances of yours. 

On TMI portal, under RGST Act, 2017, old provisions of Section 129 are visible. Above views is by PRESUMING that Section 129 of RGST Act, 2017 is also amended on the lines of Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 and TMI has not updated RGST Act, 2017. But, my presumption is wrong / misplaced, my views will change. 

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion or recommendation.

[KASTURI SETHI]

The department's calculation is correct. There is no doubt at all.

[KANHAIYA AGRAWAL]

Respected Shri amit ji sir,

It means 50% CGST ; 50% SGST. and under IGST 100% of value of goods?

Please suggest.