Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Adjustment of excess service tax paid, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 5366
Dated: 1-3-2013
By:- sunil jain

Adjustment of excess service tax paid


  • Contents

We have paid excess service tax for Aug,12 to Dec,12 (paid in Dec & Jan,13) on GTA service on reverse charge basis(as paid withou availing 75% abatement), now can we adjust this excess tax paid for our tax liability( on a/c of GTA & Security services) for the m/o Feb,12 under rule 6(4A) of Service tax rule 1994.

rule (4A) states that such excess amount may be adjuted against his service tax liability for the succeeding month.Hence kindly advise whether adjustment is possible in succeeding months.

Thanks,

CA. R.K. Aggarwal

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 2-3-2013
By:- Hitesh Shah

Mr. Aggarwalji,

In my understanding such excess payment is not on account of reason involving interpretation of valuation or law. Therefore you can very well adjust such excess payment against liability of succeeding month.

As regards adjustment of excess tax paid under GTA with liability of tax on security services, I am of the opinion that same can be done. I reach to this conclusion by relying on Circular 58/07/2003 - dated - 20-05-2003. Although the said circular does not exactly cover the given facts, but it does shows the intention of department to avoid collecting the  same tax in different names.

Third issue regarding Rule 6(4A), excess amount can be adjusted against liability of succeeding months. Had the intention of legislation been to restrict the adjustment to only succeeding month, then same would have bben expressly provided by way of words "Immediate Succeeding Month".

Do revert with your views on same.

Thanking You

CA Amit Hariya


2 Dated: 2-3-2013
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Kindly refer para 2(b) of Notification No. 4/2008-ST dated 01-03-2008 in this regard for monetory limitation issue also:

para 2 (b) in sub-rule (4B), in clause (iii), for the words “rupees fifty thousand”, the words “on lakh rupees” shall be substituted.

 


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates