1983 (1) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al Damodarlal. The case of the assessee is that no valid service was effected of the said notice and, therefore, the assessment made on him was not valid. The ITO examined the notice server and Phool Chand. The case of the assessee is that the assessee was a partnership in a firm M/s. Radheyshyam Damodarlal and that firm discontinued from the year 1963-64 and, thereafter, with a gap of six months .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s Radheyshyam Damodarlal had discontinued from the year 1963-64 and that on the same premises after a gap of six months, another firm M/s. Murarilal Damodarlal had started his business and that he was a partner therein. No question was asked to him if the notice bore his signature and if the notice was ever served on the assessee in his presence by the notice server. Thus their is not evidence to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der 5, r.17 are that in case of refusal for the notice by the assessee that should be duly affixed on either the business or the residential premises. In the instant case, the case of the revenue is that when the notice was refused in the presence of Shri Phool Chand by the assessee, the same was affixed by the notice server on the business premises of the assessee. The AAC is wrong in observing t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X