9911796707
TMI Blog1984 (7) TMI 256X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri K.V. Kunhikrishnan, D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : B.B. Gujral, Vice-President]. - We have heard, Shri R.K. Jain, learned Consultant in support of the Appeal dated 27-1-1984 filed by M/s Phoolson Agricultural Industries (Regd.), Baraut against the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 237 & 238/1983, passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. We also heard Sh. K.V. Kunhikrishn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on of the appellants inasmuch as he has addressed the order to M/s. Phoolson Industries (Regd.), Baraut (UP) instead of M/s. Phoolson Agricultural Industries (Regd.) Baraut (U.P.). Fourthly, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal without giving any opportunity of personal hearing to the appellants which was specifically requested by the appellants in their Letter dated ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. 5. Having considered the submissions, we are of the view that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) seems to have decided the matter in hurry and without complying with the statutory requirements of giving personal hearing to the appellants. In view of this, we set aside the order in appeal and remand the case to the Collector ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
