1987 (12) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot appear at the hearing on 1-12-1987. 2. The bench took up the condonation of delay as the appeal was delayed by a certain time. M/s. Aksharchhaya say that the delay was caused by the fact that they filed their appeal to the Government of India instead of this Tribunal. We consider that the delay should be condoned and so we condone it. 3. M/s. Aksharchhaya appeal that the parts should be cha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otypesetter itself without going into the details of the accessories. 5. The SDR, however, pointed out that it would not be possible to accept the contention of the appellants, since as recorded in the order-in-appeal, the accessories and parts, though shipped with the phototypeseller, were not compulsorily supplied with the machine, but have been listed and charged separately in the invoice. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X