1987 (8) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... only issue for determination in this appeal is the correct classification under the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the CET) of six consignments of glass mirrors imported by the appellants. The appellant s claim that the goods fell under Item No. 68 CET was rejected by the lower authorities, the lower authorities holding that the correct classi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e also after 1-3-1979. Following the Supreme Court s decision, we hold that the glass mirrors involved in these consignments were also classifiable under Item No. 68 CET. The appeals are allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. 4. The Registry, it appears, has erroneously asked the appellants to file supplementary fees on the basis that Collector (Appeals) had disposed of 6 appeals. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X