1988 (1) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the case are that the respondent company availed of the benefit of the Notification No. 117/66 dated 16-7-1966 in respect of patent or proprietary medicines (P or P medicines) sold by the respondent company to the E.S.I.C. - a Govt. department - on the prices in terms of the contract entered into by the respondent company with the E.S.I.C. authorities. The goods were, however, cleared by the resp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otification. This point having been decided by the original authority at the first instance against the respondent company herein was decided in their favour by the lower appellate in its order-in-appeal dated 27-10-1978. That authority, however remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for checking on the two facts, namely (i) whether the sales by the manufacturers to the chemists invol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e not cleared to the E.S.I.C. authorities but to the approved retail chemist shops. The lower appellate authority by the impugned order has again confirmed the earlier orders of the predecessor authority and he has fully agreed with the decisions of its predecessor authority. The appellant-Collector has filed the appeal against the impugned order on the same ground that the medicines have not be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X