TMI Blog2010 (4) TMI 56X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO [2008 -TMI - 6100 - SUPREME Court]. However, the same was not forthcoming and the Assessing Officer proceeded with the assessment proceedings and framed the assessment orders in both cases on 31.12.2009 – held that - no speaking orders have been passed and the objections have only been taken care of in the assessment orders. Consequently ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d of. - 2305/2010 & CM 4638/2010, 2307/2010 & CM 4642/2010 - - - Dated:- 8-4-2010 - Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the Petitioner: Mr Ajay Vohra, Ms Kavita Jha and Ms Akansha Aggarwal For the Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal CORAM:- Hon'ble Mr Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed Hon'ble Mr Justice V.K. Jain 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the ju ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s thereto in both cases. The assessee, thereafter, awaited the passing of the speaking orders in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO 259 ITR 19 (SC). However, the same was not forthcoming and the Assessing Officer proceeded with the assessment proceedings and framed the assessment orders in both cases on 31.12.2009. 3. The petitioner/as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y clear as laid down by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (supra), wherein it has been indicated that the framing of the assessment has to proceed only after passing of the speaking order. In the present cases, no speaking orders have been passed and the objections have only been taken care of in the assessment orders. Consequently, the only course left to us is to direct that the assessment or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|