9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (7) TMI 73X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 4th May, 2009 whereby the appeal filed by the Revenue being ITA No. 2344/Del of 2008 against the order dated 10th April, 2008 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), in respect of A.Y.2005-06, was dismissed. 2. The assessee foundation was setup in order to provide fees, books, equipments and scholarship, etc. to needy students, to help mentally retar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e assessee was a tool in the hands of the parent company, that is, HCL Perot System. Accordingly, he denied benefit of exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the assessee and determined its taxable income at Rs.70,98,120/- and expense of Rs.10,00,820/- inclusive of depreciation. 3. On appeal filed by the assessee, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the additio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e finding recorded by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 5. We have heard Ms. Bansal, learned counsel for the revenue on the question of admission. Section 13 of Income Tax Act stipulates the circumstances in which the income of a trust will not be exempted from its income. In the present case, as noted by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), there was no material on record to suggest that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l elements to these donations without even indicating any circumstance which could give rise to such an inference. The order passed by the Assessing Officer does not show that the Directors of HCL Perot Systems were connected with these organizations or were managing their affairs. The payments to all the organizations were made by account payee cheques. Confirmations from 41 out of 43 organizatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntion by this Court. No contravention of Section 13 of Income Tax Act having been made out and the genuineness of the donations having been accepted by Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) as well as by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, there is no ground for interference by this Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act. No substantial question of law arises for our consideration in this case. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
