TMI Blog2009 (8) TMI 655X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al is preferred by the appellant against the order wherein the request of the appellant was rejected for conversion of 15 shipping bills from DFRC to DEEC shipping bills. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant affected the export of goods during the period March, 2005 to February, 2006 and the corresponding BRC's submitted by them indicate that realizations were also made during the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... wrongly rejected their request and he further placed reliance on Modipon Ltd. v. CC, New Delhi, 2009 (234) E.L.T. 143 (Tri.-Del.). 6. On the other hand, the Ld. SDR submits that the adjudicating authority has rightly arrived at the decision of the rejecting the request of the appellant. He further placed reliance on CCE, Vadodara v. Dhiren Chemical Industries, 2002 (139) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) = 2001-( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|