2010 (9) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the revenue was dismissed by this Court - Held that: - the order passed by the Tribunal is merely consequential - 284 of 2010 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 1-9-2010 - CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the appellant. ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal under Section 260A of the Inco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Tribunal against which appeal of the revenue was dismissed by this Court on 9.2.2010 being ITA No. 202 of 2009 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak v. Sh. Tek Chand Saini). By impugned order Tribunal has set aside the assessment made. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 4. In view of the fact that order under Section 263 of the Act has been held to be invalid, the order passe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X