2010 (6) TMI 264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R   Avinash Poddar for the Appellant. Rajendra Nagar for the Respondent. ORDER B.S.V. Murthy, Technical Member - The appellants are engaged in providing security services. Service tax of Rs. 30,26,224 with interest has been confirmed for the period from 1-4-1999 to 31-1-2004 and penalty has also been imposed against the appellant. 2. It was submitted by the appellant that the appellants .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nds, it was requested that the matter may be remanded. 3. The Commissioner has observed in his order that tax liability was worked out on the basis of worksheet admitted by the Director. He has also observed that the appellant did not indicate the amount of relief on this account nor furnished any supporting worksheet. Further, request for Cenvat credit was not made before Commissioner (Appeals) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X