Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2010 (5) TMI 372

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rovided by the Goods Transport Agent, cannot become the output service of the service receiver - Appellants are directed to pay part of the amount - requirement of pre-deposit of remaining service tax demand, interest and penalty shall stand waived and recovery thereof stayed
Shri Rakesh Kumar, Member (T) REPRESENTED BY : None, for the Appellant. ShriI. Baig, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This is an application for waiver from the requirement of pre-deposit of Service tax demand of Rs. 1,21,445/- and penalty of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 77 upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide order-in-Appeal No. 3-4/ST/APPL/CHD-II/09 dt. 30-4-09. 2. The Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely ACC sheets, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he service tax demand of Rs. 1,21,445/- was confirmed under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 alongwith interest under Section 75 ibid and while no penalty was imposed under Section 76, penalty of Rs.1,000/- was imposed under Section 77 for not filing the service tax-3 return by the due date. On appeal to Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner (Appeals) vide order-in-appeal Nos. 3-4/ST/Appl/CHD-II/2009 dt. 30-4-09 upheld the Asstt. Commissioner's order. It is against this order that the present appeal and stay application have been filed. 3.The Appellant vide letter dt. 15-4-10 have requested for decision of the stay application on merit. 3.1 Heard Shri I. Baig learned DR who pleaded that the Appellant, who are required to pay servi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent, cannot become the output service of the service receiver. Prima facie, therefore, I am inclined to agree with the Board's circular. Therefore, notwithstanding the fact that this issue is pending before a Larger Bench, in the case of Panchmahal Steel Ltd v. CCE, Vadodara-II reported in 2008 (12) S.T.R. 447 (Tri.-Ahmd.) I am of the view that this is not a case for total waiver. The Appellants are directed to pay an amount of Rs. 60,000/- within a period of eight weeks from the date of this order. Compliance to be reported on 26-7-2010. On deposit of this amount within the stipulated period, the requirement of pre-deposit of remaining service tax demand, interest and penalty shall stand waived and recovery thereof stayed. (Order dictated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates