9911796707
TMI Blog1986 (11) TMI 281X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rected against the Union of India and one S.K. Bhatta, Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, Bombay, at the relevant time and now holding the same position in New Delhi. 2. By his judgment and order dated 20th August 1985, Pratap J. disposed of the aforementioned writ petition and directed the Union of India, the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, New Delhi, and the Joint Chief Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Pratap J. They are, however, still not carried out. 5. I, therefore, asked Mr. Bulchandani, learned counsel for the Union of India and the said Bhatta, when the order of Pratap J. would be complied with. He stated that even as late as 2 p.m. today telex and telephonic messages had been received from the said Bhatta at New Delhi that the petitioners licence would be endorsed with a clause addit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... been incorporated the respondents have failed to comply with the order of Pratap J., as upheld by the Division Bench of this Court and the Supreme Court, and are in contempt. There is no attempt to purge the contempt. 7. The said Bhatta is no longer the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, Bombay, but it is clear from the messages that I have been shown that he is still the officer who ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mpt and liable to be punished therefor until an endorsement is made upon the petitioners licence that conforms exactly with the order passed by Pratap J. In view of this observation, the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law and Company Affairs, Bombay, is directed forthwith to send a copy of this order to the Commerce Ministry of the Union of India. 11. The Union of India and the said Bhatta to pay ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
