9911796707
TMI Blog1994 (3) TMI 221X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he truck was subsequently released provisionally by the order of the Superintendent dated 11-10-1988 on the appellant depositing Rs. 50,000/- and executing a bond for Rs. 3 lakhs. 3. It was his submission that the goods alleged to have been smuggled which were found in the truck had been loaded by the driver without his knowledge or permission and he had no connection with the contraband goods and their carriage and, therefore, it is the fault of the driver. 4. It was his submission that actually he was ill and had gone away to his village and was away for nearly two months when the seizure took place and, therefore, he was not aware of what his driver had done and, therefore, neither the truck was liable to confiscation nor he was liab ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tercepted two trucks and one of them which belongs to the appellant was found to carry contraband goods such as almonds concealed under coal and the driver confessed that the foreign almonds were packed in packages and on his information, the other truck with contraband goods such as synthetic yarn and chinese torches concealed under the coal was also seized. 10. The word `legal in the show cause notice is a typographical error and is meant to indicate illegal import from Nepal and the reasonable belief has been shown for the purpose of seizure. 11 In fact, this is a well known mode of illegal diversion of goods imported for Nepal and the documents which the truck driver was carrying were all found to be fake and the addresses of the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to confiscation is concerned, we observe that since both the Department and the appellant are relying on the statement of the driver and this statement also mentions inter alia that they used to earn extra charges for carrying contraband and this used to be shared between the driver and the owner, this itself shows that the truck was being deliberately used for carrying contraband with the consent of the owner on the basis of an understanding. In the circumstances, we hold that the truck was liable to confiscation and the appellant was liable to penalty. However, we observe that the learned Counsel is correct in pointing out that the truck having been released provisionally on cash deposit and bond, could not be confiscated again unless it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
