9911796707
TMI Blog1990 (10) TMI 226X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. In the hearing which took place on 22-8-1990, Shri D.M. Mehta, the ld. Consultant, on behalf of the applicants/appellants pleaded that there is a gross violation of principles of natural justice in this case. The applicants/appellants factory was under labour trouble. Earlier, in reply to the first show cause notice, they have sent a letter dated 15-6-1987 r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inal records and argued that the reply to the second show cause notice, even if it is received, would not have been considered by the adjudicating authority, since the order has already been passed on the noting side as early as on 9-11-1989 and the letter is stated to have been received only on 29-12-1989. He showed the order on the noting side dated 9-11-1989. He also contended that as per the D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation of removal has been made. We find that the Addl. Collector has not given them proper time for re-conciliation, resulting in passing the impugned order. We are also satisfied that the reply to the second show cause notice as well as the earlier show cause notice have been filed requesting for offering such an opportunity. In the circumstances, we would deem it proper to set aside the order pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
