1995 (5) TMI 179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : K. Sankararaman, Member, (T)]. These are a bunch of four appeals filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II against four separate orders-in-appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay whereby the latter had disposed of four appeals filed before him by M/s. Lenec Institute of Pharma (P) Ltd. who are respondents h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o be decided by the Bench. 3. Shri N.R. Khaitan, learned Advocate of M/s. Khaitan Company is present on behalf of the respondents. He makes available a copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court referred by the learned Departmental Representative. He points out that the ratio laid down in the Madras High Court judgment which was relied upon and followed by the Collector (Appeals) in his impugne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rugs Pvt. Ltd. on whose behalf the respondents have manufactured the subject goods as loan licensee. In the Astra Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. case decided by the Supreme Court, a distinction had been made between house mark and product mark. It was laid down therein that the `house mark which is usually a device in the form of an emblem, word or both is an identification of the manufacturer which is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X