Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1996 (4) TMI 192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3. Learned Counsel had submitted before us that the appellants were manufacturers of hard boards and they had imported plant and machinery in this connection. Later on they were required to import some spare parts and hence a consignment of `wearing plates' was imported by them. It was classified by the Customs House under Heading 73.13 at the time of clearance of the goods. They however claimed reassessment on the ground that the wearing plates imported by them were parts of their pulp making machinery and, therefore, correctly classifiable under 84.31-Cus. with 68 CET. 4. These Headings read as under : Heading No. Sub-Heading No. and description of article  Rate of duty   Prefer  Standard- ential .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n disallowing their claim. 8. They had filed a petition before the Collector (Appeals), but the same was also rejected on the ground that these are not identifiable as parts of the pulp making machinery. 9. It was their submission that in view of the drawing submitted by them, their contention that the item imported was part of the machinery may be accepted. He would like to mention that after importation, all that is required to be done is merely to bend them at 30o angle in order to fit them in the machinery and use them as spare parts. Hence the request. 10. In response to queries from the Bench, he stated that he was not in a position to show any technical literature or any other material in support of his contention e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... leading to their bending at 30o angle. It is possible that after such a post importation process, they may have become identifiable part of machinery, but, we are concerned with the items as imported and presented for clearances. Hence the orders of the lower authorities are correct. 14. We observe that the DR's submissions have a strong force. The Assistant Collector has in his order-in-original, referred to the examination report which shows that the items were plates and sheets only and were not identifiable as parts of machinery at the time of importation and we are concerned with the form of goods in which they were imported and presented for assessment at the time of clearance. We are not concerned with any post- importation pro .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates