1996 (4) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espect of goods that were lying in stock and were received for the job work, under Rule 57H of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. 2. The Ld. Consultant for the Respondents has pleaded that there were other inputs lying in stock at the relevant time and Modvat Credit in respect of the same has been allowed. So far as this quantum of goods which were received on job work basis the Modvat Cred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the supplier of the goods. He has also pleaded the appellants opted for Modvat credit and the endorsement on the gate pass was changed and the gate pass was endorsed in the name of the appellants. It is observed that the Modvat credit facility under Rule 57H has been permitted in respect of the inputs which were lying in stock immediately before the filing of the declaration. The goods have to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ds of the assessee under which goods were received might not therefore meet of the requirements for Modvat purpose under Rule 57G. Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 57G the statute has provided for the facility of Modvat in respect of the goods which might be lying in stock before the filing of the declaration by the assessee under Rule 57G for availing of the Modvat credit. Discretion in thi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X