9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (8) TMI 184X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. When the matter was called on 2-7-1996, it was brought to the notice of the Bench that Shri Randhir Singh, Advocate for the appellants had filed an application seeking directions from the Tribunal, stating that the appellants had engaged another Counsel without any intimation to him and without filing any no objection certificate from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed for taking necessary action under the Advocates Act, 1961. A rejoinder was filed by Shri Randhir Singh and Shri J.S. Sinha on 22-7-1996 setting out the details of payment of fees and contending that the fee earlier paid was for representation before the adjudicating authority i.e. the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut and that the bills dated 24-1-1996 and 27-6-1996 were for fees, etc. for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... We do not wish to be drawn into the controversy as to whether any fees were owing from the appellants to Shri J.S. Sinha and Shri Randhir Singh. This is a matter which, in our opinion, is to be sorted out between the appellants and the Counsel without recourse to the Tribunal. It is open to the appellants to take action available to them under the law, if so advised. We are confining ourselves to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
