Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1996 (8) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ol etc. As regards skull scrap, the Dy. Collector has clearly erred in saying that the invoices/delivery challans of the Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. stockyard, Burnpur have not been recognized to be the valid document for the purpose of taking credit. As contended by the appellant, the invoices of the integrated steel plant are acceptable as GP-1 as per Board s letter No. 1/73/70-CX. 6 dated 12-4-1971 under Rule 52A. It is further seen that the combined despatch advices and challan and bills carry a certificate on the reverse that central excise duty has been paid on the goods covered by the invoice. The relevant computerised challans here are found to be issued in the name of the appellants from which also it is apparent that the excise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ral Excise Rules. 3. The respondents herein in reply to the show cause notice relied upon the proviso 2 of the Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and submitted that they had applied for L-4 licence for manufacture of iron and non-alloy steel billets/ingots and stainless steel billets/ingots : that they filed a declaration under Rule 57G: that they received inputs on 26-12-1990 and that they had correctly availed Modvat credit. After considering all the facts, the Dy. Collector disallowed the Modvat credit and asked the respondents to pay the same under Rule 57-I on the ground that lancing pipe and foundry fluxes nozzles are used for free flowing of oxygen and liquid metal respectively and are thus parts of machinery and credit ava .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... machinery on which credit is not available, that in the case of Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. v. C.C.E. reported in 1990 (50) E.L.T. 252 and Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. C.C.E. reported in 1991 (56) E.L.T. 649 this Tribunal denied Modvat credit on wire netting, dandy covers and woollen felts holding that the items are essential part of paper-making machinery whose main use is to keep the machinery functional. The ld. DR submitted that the use of lancing pipe and foundry fluxes nozzles are identical to those discussed in the case of Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills and Sirpur Paper Mills. The ld. DR, therefore, submitted that the ratio of the decision of the above two cases covers the present case squarely and prayed that the appeal may be allowed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the respondent was entitled to take credit on 26-12-1990 and I hold accordingly. 8. On the second issue, I find that the Hon ble Calcutta High Court had gone into this question in extensio. For the sake of convenience paras 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 are reproduced : Furthermore if there were any doubt, I hold that appliance 20. must be read ejusdem generis with the preceding words. The words preceding constitute a specific category or a distinct genus and if there were any doubt, as to the meaning of the word of appliance, which in my view there is no, the same must be construed with reference to that genus or category. The preceding words have been defined in Mc-Graw Hills dictionary as follows : `Apparatus A compoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibunal has erred in seeking to limit the meaning of the word `inputs to those items which go into the steel ingot completely overlooking the phrase `in relation to in the definition in the major clause of the explanation. 23. The respondents then argued that steel ingots could be manufactured even without the items. That may be so, but that is immaterial. The definition of inputs is not dependent upon what ought to be used but what is in fact used. There is no dispute that the petitioner No. 1 had in fact, used and uses the items in the manufacturing of ingots. The Supreme Court has also held that manufacture would include a process which was commercially expedient in the production of goods [see : Collector of Central Excise v. Eastend .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates