1997 (7) TMI 353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hri D.S. Negi, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - M/s. Rajasthan Industries and Scientific Corporation imported 600 sets of prisms for binocular head. The classification suggested by them was under Heading 90.11/12 as parts and accessories solely or principally for use in binocular head. The Assistant Collector howe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has not been touched upon. It has been contended in the appeal memorandum and by Shri Negi that the goods were described as prisms and that they were not mounted. We find in the Collector's order that the reply to the specific query the importers had claimed that the prisms were in the mounted condition ready for use and that each set was having four pieces of prisms. This specific statement of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, reported in 1996 (88) E.L.T. 176 (Tribunal), the CEGAT held that reliance had to be placed on the information given by the technical experts. As regards the claim from the Revenue that the Collector's relevance on the citation placed before him was not justified, we find that both the citations namely 1983 (12) E.L.T. 161 (CEGAT) and 1983 (12) E. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X