Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1997 (9) TMI 247

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R. Pant, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : S.K. Dhar, Member (T)]. - All these appeals are directed against common Order-in-Appeal, dated 31-3-1987 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi. The appellants imported, under 5 Bills of Entries, consignments which were described in the Bill of Entries as components for honing machines. These were assessed to duty under CTH 8466 w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s that the parts also included general purpose parts as indicated by the Collector (Appeals) and, therefore, such general purpose parts would not be classifiable under Chapter 84.66. In this view of the matter, benefit would not be admissible. While conceding that they are parts of honing machines, the learned DR stated that this was done for the purpose of Notification 151/87 since what was mater .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed articles are honing machines. The Assistant Collector without recording any reasons, has rejected the claim for benefit under Notification 156/86, dated 1-3-1986 recording that `the benefit of this notification does not apply to the goods imported by the party'. The Collector (Appeals) has observed that many parts fall under different items. Accordingly, these component parts of machine tools w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion 156/86. We have earlier referred to the fact that goods have been accepted as parts of honing machines classifiable under Heading 84.66 and there was no Revenue appeal. It was however, fairly conceded by the learned Advocate that if certain goods do not fall under Chapters 84, 85, 86 and 90, exemptions could be denied in respect of such goods. 5. As regards auxiliary duty under Notificat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and which goods would go out of this heading. We therefore, remand this matter to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs for de novo decision after arriving at a finding as to which goods would be covered under Chapters 84, 85, 89 and 90 and would, therefore, consequently get benefit of Notification 156/86 and 159/88. The appellants shall be heard in person and appellants would be at liberty to pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates