1997 (12) TMI 254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esident]. Order dated 16-8-1990 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Faridabad is under challenge in this appeal. 2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of ceramic tiles, was also getting small quantity of the tiles printed and distributed to dealers and collecting Rs. 9.50 per tile from the dealers and also distributing a small quantity of printed tiles to Govt. Departm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Additional Collector confirmed the demand. This order is now challenged. 3. Bulk of the amount leading to the impugned demand relates to part of cost of printed tiles recovered by the appellant from dealers to whom printed tiles were distributed. By printed tile is meant the ordinary ceramic tile with a calendar printed thereon. Printing work was got done through job worker. According to the app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e dealers. Tribunal has held in Appeal Nos. E/2270/90-A and 3003/92-A by Final Order Nos. 1060 1061/95-A, that a part of the cost of gift articles collected by the manufacturer from the dealer cannot be included in the assessable value. In this view Rs. 9.50 per tile collected by the appellant from the dealers cannot be included in the assessable value. 4. Part of amount collected by the appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X