1998 (1) TMI 152

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dent]. Shri C.T. Varghese, Liaison Officer of respondent who is present prayed for adjournment on the ground that Shri P.S. Raman, Advocate is indisposed. It does not appear to us that Shri P.S. Raman has filed any Vakalatnama. We do not find it necessary to adjourn the appeal. We have heard Shri K. Srivastava, SDR for the Appellant Collector. 2. The dispute arose in relation to 12 refund .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alue for the purpose of quantifying duty. This is clearly a case where the respondent has paid excess duty and the claim for refund is legitimate. Shri K. Srivastava points out that out of the 12 refund claims referred to in the last paragraph of the order of the Assistant Collector, claims numbers 1 to 8 and 10 are clearly barred by limitation and part of the remaining claims may be barred. This .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X