1997 (6) TMI 218

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is directed against Order-in-Appeal dated 16-1-1991. The appellants imported Sheath and Obtruator and Examining Bridge, White support Loop and Ball Tip Electrode, Albarran Bridge/DC Fin. and Sheath 26FR STD Beak. They claimed benefit of Notification 65/88 which exempted medical equipment from part of customs duty leviable thereon. This claim was rejected by Collector on the ground that what has be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l equipment, parts/accessories etc. which have been specified in the table annexed to the notification. Since the impugned goods have not been specified in the Table annexed to the Notification, the benefit of concessional rate of duty is not applicable to them. The impugned order is upheld and appeal rejected." 5. Notification exempts medical equipment, their accessories and spare parts falli .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The goods admittedly are parts of cystoscope. Being parts of cystoscope, they would in the alternative get exemption under Notification 66/88, dated 1-3-1988. 6. This in fact is what is pleaded by the appellants in their Appeal-memo where they have prayed that assuming without admitting that the goods are not covered by Notification No. 65/88-Cus., these are eligible for benefit of Notification .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X